Fashion Tariffs 101

This will be a busy year of trade rhetoric, and we hope it is a busy year on smart trade policy. Read on for a bit of context on what that means in relation to clothes, shoes, accessories, travel goods, and how strategically applied tariffs can make a difference.

Tariffs on U.S. Importers | Tariffs Are Taxes

It’s no secret that much of the clothing and footwear you purchase is imported. We are a highly globalized industry, and your most trusted brands have sophisticated and responsible supply chains across the world. What is surprising is that American brands and their consumers are footing a tariff burden that is outdated, regressive, and even misogynistic!

Did You Know?  

  • The average effective tariff rate on both footwear and apparel is over five times higher than on all other U.S. imports.  
  • Fashion’s share of total U.S. imports is about five percent while fashion’s share of total duties is more than 25 percent.  
  • Many are surprised to learn that there is STILL an extra burden borne by woman due to a “pink tariff” - U.S. tariff rates on women's clothes are about three percent higher on average than tariffs on men's clothes.   
  • The disparity means an extra cost of about $2 billion+ for females (or more precisely, buyers of women's clothes and shoes) as of 2018.

Although fashion’s supply chains have evolved considerably over the past decade alone, the tariffs governing that supply chain are still anchored in the policies that led to the Great Depression. 

Fashion tariffs are also regressive, not only by disproportionately taxing the disposable income of lower income American more than their richer counterparts, but also by charging higher tariff rates on product that they buy in greater quantities than wealthier Americans. For any conversation regarding new tariffs, it makes sense to address the longstanding gender discrimination.

A woman pulling a pink wallet out of a teal purse with the text "Those purchasing woman's clothing & shoes are facing a collective tariff disparity of $2B+ since 2018 alone"

 

How Can Tariffs Be Strategic? 

Tariffs, thoughtfully applied for strategic ends, can play an important role in advancing U.S. economic and security policies. But across the board tariffs, particularly on fashion articles and materials, and other items that are not made at scale in the United States, only fuel inflation. We look forward to a renewed and invigorated conversation on smart tariff and trade policy, not only to make sure we can fix a centuries old problem, but also to ensure we have the tools to keep us competitive, fashionably so, well into the coming decades.  

With the new Administration’s claims that it will implement new tariffs – on U.S. imports from China, Mexico, and across the globe – we’ll quickly explain how that could play out. 

Recent Comments & Testimony

Feb. 20, 2025

AAFA Testifies Before ITC on CBERA and Haiti

AAFA testified before the International Trade Commission regarding its investigation on the Caribbean Basin. Highlights of the testimony included the importance of renewing the Haiti HOPE/HELP programs.

Feb. 19, 2025

AAFA Provides Testimony Regarding Vermont H238

AAFA provided testimony on February 19 to the Vermont House Committee on Environment sharing our concerns on H. 238.

Feb. 14, 2025

AAFA and Partners Express Concerns Regarding SB 54 Rulemaking

AAFA and partner associations expressed concerns about the impact of California’s pending EPR regulations on textile recycling.

Follow with #TariffsHurt #TariffsAreTaxes
Contact us: tariffs@aafaglobal.org | media@aafaglobal.org